Scores of children train to become suicide bombers at a camp run by Qair Hussain in Spinkai, South Waziristan. Image courtesy of AfPax Insider. |
Do you remember back in April 2009, when Husain Haqqani, Pakistan’s ambassador to the United States, tried to assure the world that the Malakand Accord (the agreement that ceded the Swat Valley to the Taliban) had been signed with local tribal elders and religious leaders not affiliated with the Taliban? Here is what Haqqani said in an op-ed in The Wall Street Journal back then, as he chastised the US for not providing military aid:
The recent spike of international concern about the threat in Pakistan seems to stem from the recent dialogue between the government of the Pashtunkhwa Northwest Frontier Province of Pakistan and a local movement that supported Islamic law but did not join the Taliban’s violent campaign. The goal for this dialogue was twofold — first, to restore order and stability to the Swat Valley; and second, to wedge rational elements of the religiously conservative population away from terrorists and fanatics.
…
The dialogue in Swat resulted in an agreement that would allow for elements of Shariah to be applied to the judicial system of the Valley, as it has at other times in our nation’s history. This agreement demanded that the native Taliban put down their weapons, pledge nonviolence, and accept the writ of the state. It was a local solution for what some in Pakistan viewed as a local problem.
Let me be perfectly clear here: Pakistan’s civil and military leadership understands that al Qaeda and its allies are not potential negotiating partners. But, as the U.S. did in Iraq, Pakistan sought to distinguish between reconcilable and irreconcilable elements within an expanding insurgency.
But as we knew back when the Malakand Accord was signed in February 2009, the deal was cut with the Taliban. Yesterday, Asfandyar Wali Khan, the leader of the Awami National Party, which governs the Northwest Frontier Province, said the peace agreement had been made “under duress,” Dawn reported:
“One militant wearing a suicide vest placed himself behind Afrasiab Khattak and one behind Mian Iftikhar (the party’s senior leaders) during the signing ceremony.”
So, according to Ambassador Husain Haqqani, the “rational elements of the religiously conservative population” in Pakistan negotiate while wearing suicide vests?
Are you a dedicated reader of FDD's Long War Journal? Has our research benefitted you or your team over the years? Support our independent reporting and analysis today by considering a one-time or monthly donation. Thanks for reading! You can make a tax-deductible donation here.
5 Comments
Husain Haqqani is a lying criminal. He’lll face court and jail if he goes there for corruption and murder. He never goes to Pakistan. Only reason he is in power cuz he is Zardari/Bhutto’s criminal buddy and share the same goal – loot Pakistan as long as you can!
This guy represents Pakistan and characterises all that is wrong with Pakistan–one slimy lie after another deception and so the dance of the viscious circle in which people like him live.
Incredible how the Wall Street Journal so happily becomes party to such nonsense!
In the context of Malakand WAR and its results this news item has no relevance now. Further I think all the parties knew who done the agreement and with whom..
waheed,
Most news outlets prefer to let things like this slide when it happens in Pakistan.
We’ll file this one away the next time Pakistani officials, such as Husain Haqqani, want to berate the US for not providing support while lauding the next “peace agreement.”
Hi!….somebody pls also update his WIKI PROFILE! Which otherwise looks so glowing that its blinding–wonder how many lies are buried in there….