The US conducted two more airstrikes in Pakistan’s Taliban-controlled tribal agency of North Waziristan today, killing eight “militants” in an area known to host al Qaeda and other foreign terrorist groups.
Just after midnight, the CIA-operated, remotely piloted Predators or the more deadly Reapers first struck a compound in the village of Haider Khel near the town of Mir Ali. Eight missiles were fired at the compound, which was thought to be owned by an “important Taliban leader,” The Nation reported; however, it is unclear if he was killed in the strike. Five people are reported to have been killed.
A Pakistani security official told AFP that four “militants” were killed in the strike. Reuters reported that one of those killed was a “foreign tactical trainer” from either Somalia or the United Arab Emirates.
The US drones then fired several more missiles at a compound in the nearby village of Eissu Khel. Three people were reported killed in the strike, but it is unclear if they were militants or civilians.
The US has now launched six drone strikes in Pakistan this year. Three of the strikes have taken place in North Waziristan, and the other three in South Waziristan, another safe haven for al Qaeda, the Taliban, and other terror groups.
In a strike on Jan. 3, the US killed Mullah Nazir, the leader of a Taliban group in South Waziristan who was closely allied with Bahadar, al Qaeda, and the Afghan Taliban. In one of two strikes on Jan. 6, the US also killed Wali Mohammed, a Taliban commander who is said to have directed suicide operations for the Movement of the Taliban in Pakistan.
Last year, the US launched 46 strikes in Pakistan, according to data compiled by The Long War Journal. In 2011, the US launched 64 strikes; in 2010, when the program was at its peak, there were 117 strikes.
The program was ramped up by President George W. Bush in the summer of 2008 (35 strikes were launched that year) and continued under President Barack Obama after he took office in 2009 (53 strikes that year). From 2004-2007, only 10 strikes were recorded. Although some of al Qaeda’s top leaders have been killed in drone strikes since the program began in 2004, al Qaeda has been able to replace those lost in the attacks. [For data on the strikes, see LWJ reports, Charting the data for US airstrikes in Pakistan, 2004 – 2013; and Senior al Qaeda and Taliban leaders killed in US airstrikes in Pakistan, 2004 – 2013.]
The US has targeted al Qaeda’s top leaders and its external operations network, and the assortment of Taliban and Pakistani jihadist groups operating in the region. The strikes have largely been confined to a small kill box consisting of North and South Waziristan. Of the 331 strikes recorded since 2004, 314, or 95%, have taken place in the two tribal agencies.
Mir Ali is a terrorist haven
The Mir Ali area is in the sphere of influence of Abu Kasha al Iraqi, an al Qaeda leader who serves as a key link to the Taliban and supports al Qaeda’s external operations network. He is rumored to have been killed in a US drone strike last year, but the report was never confirmed.
Taliban leader Hafiz Gul Bahadar and the Haqqani Network also operate in the Mir Ali area. Moreover, Mir Ali is a known hub for al Qaeda’s military and external operations councils.
Since Sept. 8, 2010, several Germans and Britons have been reported killed in Predator strikes in the Mir Ali area. The Europeans were members of the Islamic Jihad Group (IJG), an al Qaeda affiliate based in the vicinity of Mir Ali. The IJG members are believed to have been involved in an al Qaeda plot that targeted several major European cities and was modeled after the terror assault on the Indian city of Mumbai in 2008. The European plot was orchestrated by Ilyas Kashmiri, the al Qaeda leader who was killed in a US drone strike in June 2011.
Mir Ali also hosts at least three suicide training camps for the the Fedayeen-i-Islam, an alliance between the Pakistani Taliban, the anti-Shia Lashkar-e-Jhangvi, and Jaish-e-Mohammed. In early 2011, a Fedayeen-i-Islam spokesman claimed that more than 1,000 suicide bombers have trained at three camps. One failed suicide bomber corroborated the Fedayeen spokesman’s statement, claiming that more than 350 suicide bombers trained at his camp.
Prior to this year, the US has been pounding targets in the Datta Khel, Miramshah, and Mir Ali areas of North Waziristan in an effort to kill members involved in the European plot. Al Qaeda and allied terror groups such as the Islamic Movement of Uzbekistan, the Islamic Jihad Group, the Eastern Turkistan Islamic Party, Jaish-e-Mohammed, Lashkar-e-Jhangvi, and a number of Pakistani and Central and South Asian terror groups host or share camps in the region. These groups are given aid and shelter by Taliban leader Hafiz Gul Bahadar and the Haqqani Network, a Taliban subgroup run by Siraj and Jalaluddin Haqqani.
Despite the known presence of al Qaeda and other foreign groups in North Waziristan, and requests by the US that action be taken against these groups, the Pakistani military has indicated that it has no plans to take on Hafiz Gul Bahadar or the Haqqani Network. Bahadar and the Haqqanis are considered “good Taliban” by the Pakistani military establishment as they do not carry out attacks inside Pakistan.
7 Comments
We are fighting back. Is that allowed? What if we run our of wild eyed lunatics?
First strike- 8 missiles! There must have been someone they really wanted.
Its refreshing to read that the US has been active in targeting ‘structures’ housing the insurgent or modes of transport. Hopefully the US has been just as active in targeting ‘structures’ & ‘redoubts’ used to warehouse ammunition & other necessities in the prosecution of the insurgency by the the Taliban & their allies.
The militant lunatics are not popular in the areas where they torment the local populace. The CIA has obviously found this relationship very easy to exploit. Go Drones!
This upsurge in drone strikes might well be the storm before the calm.
For, it would appear that the Administration is utterly reversing course from three years ago. It now wants to have essentially no foot-print at all.
In which case even Pakistan’s cash flow becomes flipped. With no ISAF to speak of — if it exists in any form — Islamabad will have lost its main revenue prop.
A cynic might reason that the Administration has decided that the fulcrum of the conflict is back in Islamabad — and perhaps it always was. In which case, it’s better to put the vise on the ISI and consequent jizra to the land of the pure, as against bringing the Pashtuns up into the Sixth Century.
For it must now finally be dawning on DC that we’re paying for both sides of the campaign — with the ISI collecting a staggering ‘commission’ for services rendered.
Services such as harassing our CIA Station Chiefs in their country — and in sending on our high tech military secrets to Red China.
We can’t really put the financial screws to the malefactors in Islamabad as long as we have a crew of ‘hostages’ just to its west.
Without Western funding, just how long can Islamabad campaign in Afghanistan?
And how long can the Internet be held at bay?
At some point, the wizard of ISI is going to be exposed.
———-
One can only hope that all of the other ISAF nations pull out their ‘humanitarian aid’ missions. It’s useless to construct anything that can’t be protected.
That hydro-power project is a case in point. It needs to go into moth balls. It’s a no-win situation for Kabul. Should it ever produce — the locals end up sending their monies to the opfor!
As we showed in Iraq, any power line gambit is perpetually frustrated by sabotage — and on the cheap, for the opposition, too.
Our $1,000,000 investments are destroyed by a $100 bomb.
With that kind of operational leverage, the gambit is doomed. All power projects need to be retail — like one-family solar cookers or PV arrays in a backyard. Give up on grand FDR scale construction.
Skip bridges, paving and the rest: road construction should be limited to scraping out a vehicle path with a dozer blade.
Just that would be a true, viable improvement.
I’ve seen a few scattered reports naming a senior al-Qaeda operative Sheikh Yasin al-Kuwaiti as being killed in one of these strikes. Any info on this?
Fighting Al Qaeda is necessary, but it would be more efficient to cut the flow of financial means sourced from the Arab Peninsula. Saudi Wahabism is also responsible for what is going on in Mali.