NRO Symposium: The Saddam Hussein Verdict.

I was invited to join a symposium of experts at National Review Online on the Saddam Hussein verdict and the significance of the development – for Iraq and for the United States. My response is below, but click through to read Peter Brookes, Victor Davis Hanson, Clifford May, Andrew McCarthy, James Robbins, Michael Rubin, and Michael Yon’s opinion as well.

This is an important, symbolic victory for the government and people of Iraq. Despite the shortcomings of the Iraqi government and the security problems that continue to plague the country, the judicial process persevered through threats, assassinations, and a bloody insurgency to convict a murderous dictator who slaughtered Sunnis, Shiites and Kurds alike. Saddam should be executed immediately to close this chapter in Iraq’s bloody history. With this verdict, the tribal blood feuds across Iraq against Saddam will be closed, the Baathist fantasy of Saddam’s return to power has been crushed, and the conspiracy theories indicating that the U.S. was going to return Saddam to power have been silenced.

Regardless of whether one agrees with the current presence of American troops in Iraq, the American public should remember that the removal of Saddam and his brutal regime was the right thing to do. After 9/11, Saddam was the only world leader that openly praised al Qaeda’s mass murder of American citizens. He threatened his neighbors, constantly attacked U.S. forces enforcing the U.N.-sanctioned no-fly zone, violated the terms of the Gulf War ceasefire, and despite reporting to the contrary, clandestinely pursued weapons of mass destruction programs.

Today, Iraq has a far bigger problem than Saddam Hussein. Saddam’s bloodthirsty successors – al Qaeda, Muqtada al-Sadr’s death squads and recalcitrant Sunni insurgents – are trying to tear the country apart by turning the Iraqi people against one another. To abandon the country now would sentence the Iraqi people to a real civil war. Today’s fighting would be child’s play by comparison.

Bill Roggio is a Senior Fellow at the Foundation for Defense of Democracies and the Editor of FDD's Long War Journal.

Tags:

2 Comments

  • DJ Elliott says:

    Lisa:
    Saddam as a man is nothing much.
    Saddam as a rallying symbol is a very big deal.
    Hanging him like the common criminal he is will remove a central theme of a large portion of the insergency:
    Return to the “good old days”.
    That will have a major impact on the holdout Sunni tribal leaders.
    Especially when you add this carrot to that stick:
    http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20061106/ap_on_re_mi_ea/iraq_061104222832
    Mid-Jan is the probable hanging date. 30 “court” days.

  • patrick neid says:

    it would be helpful if we stopped viewing justice from our point of view. hanging/capital punishment is very much a part of the legal fabric of iraqi/arab life. this is an iraqi decision. we should shut up and let them deal with it. if his head ends up on a pike so be it……..

Iraq

Islamic state

Syria

Aqap

Al shabaab

Boko Haram

Isis