Pakistani official urged more Predator strikes in Pakistan

Dawn has begun to release the thousands of leaked US diplomatic cables related to Pakistan. These cables provide a window into US relations with Pakistan. And there is some interesting information on the US’s covert Predator campaign.

In a cable dated Oct. 2, 2009, the Secretariat of Pakistan’s Federally Administered Tribal Agencies (FATA) is described as “a strong advocate of U.S. strikes” and calls on the US to double tap targets – in other words, to follow up the first strike by hitting again, during the recovery phase [note: the name of the FATA Secretariat has been replaced with XXXXXXXXXXXX in the text below]:

XXXXXXXXXXXX remains a strong advocate of U.S. strikes. In fact, he suggested to PO that the U.S. consider follow-on attacks immediately after an initial strike. He explained that after a strike, the terrorists seal off the area to collect the bodies; in the first 10-24 hours after an attack, the only people in the area are terrorists, so “”you should hit them again-there are no innocents there at that time.”” His sources report that the reported September 29 strike in South Waziristan had been particularly successful; “”you will see that you hit more than has been reported in the press both in terms of quantity and quality.”” XXXXXXXXXXXX also drew a diagram essentially laying out the rationale for signature strikes that eliminated terrorist training camps and urged that the U.S. do more of these.

We have seen the US Predators double tap targets in the FATA often. The press reports in the immediate aftermath of strikes indicate that the Taliban do indeed cordon off the strike area to perform recovery operations.

Bill Roggio is a Senior Fellow at the Foundation for Defense of Democracies and the Editor of FDD's Long War Journal.

Are you a dedicated reader of FDD's Long War Journal? Has our research benefitted you or your team over the years? Support our independent reporting and analysis today by considering a one-time or monthly donation. Thanks for reading! You can make a tax-deductible donation here.

Tags: ,

2 Comments

  • kp says:

    The September 29, 2009 South Waziristan was perhaps this one in Sararogha

    29 September 2009: A drone attack reportedly killed six Taliban, including two Uzbek fighters and Taliban commander Irfan Mehsud, in a compound in Sararogha village, South Waziristan.

    https://www.longwarjournal.org/archives/2009/09/us_aircraft_strike_i.php

    The article makes comments about recovery efforts: perhaps there was an unreported follow-up attack given the commments in the leaked cable.

    The cables are also showing the USOC were/are also assisting in Pakistan (with intel, targeting and raid planning) though it looks like the US SF were willing to fight too but the Pakistani Army turned them down. They later embedded in Wana in South Waziristan and Miram Shah in North Waziristan: right in their backyard.

    http://www.dawn.com/2011/05/21/cables-reveal-role-of-us-troops-in-pakistan.html

  • ArneFufkin says:

    Are these Wikileaks cables part of the content that Bradley Manning allegedly stole and sent to Assange or are there additional, ongoing security breaches in our military or diplomatic corps?

Iraq

Islamic state

Syria

Aqap

Al shabaab

Boko Haram

Isis